March 23rd, 1984, Barrhead News
This week the News received a report
from the sub-committee of Neilston Community Council on the subject
of the threat to the future of Neilston Railway station.
In publishing the following report,
the News are confident that we are highlighting a topic which will
be of considerable interest to commuters and those who make use of
the rail link.
NEILSTON STATION - THE THREAT
REMAINS
In 1983 Strathclyde Regional
Council's Working Group on supported rail services presented its report
to, and was adopted by the Highways and Transport Committee, chaired
by Mr. Malcolm Waugh. Neilston residents, led by the Community Council,
mounted a vociferous and effective campaign to fight the threatened
closure of Neilston and Patterton stations. Many people have recently
remarked that the campaign appears to have 'gone quiet' and might
be forgiven for assuming that the threat to the Neilston line has
been removed.
The purpose of this article and the
leaflets being distributed in Neilston this week is to emphasise that
the threat to our vital rail link is still very real. The Strathclyde
plan includes elements, including application for grants to replace
ageing rolling stock, which require consideration and approval at
central government level. To date the government has chosen not to
respond to the Regional Council's report. Although Strathclyde Regional
Council has in the interim, implemented some parts of its plan e.g.
the re-opening of Kilmaurs Station, the major proposals have stalled.
POSSIBLE NEW THREAT FROM BUSES
- WHITE PAPER
The government's white paper
entitled Buses will soon introduce legislation designed to reduce
or eliminate local authorities subsidy to bus transport. MP Mr J Allan
Stewart is adamant that these proposals in no sense imply that rail
subsidies will necessarily be subjected to similar treatment.
However, Strathclyde Regions inter-preparation
of the bus proposals are, predictably, very different from Mr Stewart'
s. Malcolm Waugh contends that there is potential for massive cuts
in public transport services, to the extent that the Neilston issue
would become almost insignificant, if Government proposals on public
transport subsidy are enacted.
We could end up with no
train and an even more miserable bus service than we endure at present!
We must not become complacent and assume that the line is safe because,
apparently, nothing is happening.
|
BRITISH RAIL SOUTH
ELECTRICS PASSENGER USAGE FIGURES
|
| |
1977
|
1978
|
1979
|
1980
|
1981
|
1982
|
1983
|
| |
000s
|
000s
|
000s
|
000s
|
000s
|
000s
|
|
|
Muirend
|
351
|
446
|
509
|
518
|
500
|
335
|
561
|
|
Williamwood
|
467
|
586
|
400
|
462
|
417
|
449
|
447
|
|
Whitecraigs
|
351
|
294
|
288
|
314
|
322
|
304
|
304
|
|
Patterton
|
231
|
373
|
272
|
243
|
261
|
330
|
329
|
|
Neilston
|
343
|
346
|
354
|
427
|
461
|
460
|
489
|